Why Trump Succeeds

Marshall Kamena is a registered democrat and was elected mayor of Livermore, CA.. He ran on the democratic ticket as he knew a Bay Area city would never vote for a republican. He is as conservative as they come. He wrote the following.

Trump’s lack of decorum, dignity, and statesmanship

My Leftist friends (as well as many ardent #NeverTrumpers) constantly ask me if I’m not bothered by Donald Trump’s lack of decorum. They ask if I don’t think his tweets are “beneath the dignity of the office.”

Here’s my answer:

We Right-thinking people have tried dignity.  There could not have been a man of more quiet dignity than George W. Bush as he suffered the outrageous lies and politically motivated hatreds that undermined his presidency.

We tried statesmanship. Could there be another human being on this earth who so desperately prized “collegiality” as John McCain?

We tried propriety – has there been a nicer human being ever than Mitt Romney?

And the results were always the same. This is because, while we were playing by the rules of dignity, collegiality and propriety, the Left has been, for the past 60 years, engaged in a knife fight where the only rules are those of Saul Alinsky and the Chicago mob.

I don’t find anything “dignified,” “collegial” or “proper” about Barack Obama’s lying about what went down on the streets of Ferguson in order to ramp up racial hatreds because racial hatreds serve the Democratic Party. I don’t see anything “dignified” in lying about the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi and imprisoning an innocent filmmaker to cover your tracks. I don’t see anything “statesman-like” in weaponizing the IRS to be used to destroy your political opponents and any dissent. Yes, Obama was “articulate” and “polished” but in no way was he in the least bit “dignified,” “collegial” or “proper.”

The Left has been engaged in a war against America since the rise of the Children of the ‘60s. To them, it has been an all-out war where nothing is held sacred and nothing is seen as beyond the pale.. It has been a war they’ve fought with violence, the threat of violence, demagoguery and lies from day one – the violent take-over of the universities – till today. The problem is that, through these years, the Left has been the only side fighting this war. While the Left has been taking a knife to anyone who stands in their way, the Right has continued to act with dignity, collegiality and propriety. With Donald Trump, this all has come to an end. Donald Trump is America ’s first wartime president in the Culture War.

During wartime, things like “dignity” and “collegiality” simply aren’t the most essential qualities one looks for in their warriors. Ulysses Grant was a drunk whose behavior in peacetime might well have seen him drummed out of the Army for conduct unbecoming. Had Abraham Lincoln applied the peacetime rules of propriety and booted Grant, the Democrats might well still be holding their slaves today. Lincoln rightly recognized that, “I cannot spare this man. He fights.”

General George Patton was a vulgar-talking.. In peacetime, this might have seen him stripped of rank. But, had Franklin Roosevelt applied the normal rules of decorum then, Hitler and the Socialists would barely be five decades into their thousand-year Reich.

Trump is fighting. And what’s particularly delicious is that, like Patton standing over the battlefield as his tanks obliterated Rommel’s, he’s shouting, “You magnificent bastards, I read your book!”

That is just the icing on the cake, but it’s wonderful to see that not only is Trump fighting, he’s defeating the Left using their own tactics. That book is Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals – a book so essential to the Liberals’ war against America that it is and was the playbook for the entire Obama administration and the subject of Hillary Clinton’s senior thesis. It is a book of such pure evil, that, just as the rest of us would dedicate our book to those we most love or those to whom we are most indebted, Alinsky dedicated his book to Lucifer.

Trump’s tweets may seem rash and unconsidered but, in reality, he is doing exactly what Alinsky suggested his followers do. First, instead of going after “the fake media” — and they are so fake that they have literally gotten every single significant story of the past 60 years not just wrong, but diametrically opposed to the truth, from the Tet Offensive to Benghazi, to what really happened on the streets of Ferguson, Missouri — Trump isolated CNN.. He made it personal.

Then, just as Alinsky suggests, he employs ridicule which Alinsky described as “the most powerful weapon of all.”... Most importantly, Trump’s tweets have put CNN in an untenable and unwinnable position. ... They need to respond. This leaves them with only two choices. They can either “go high” (as Hillary would disingenuously declare of herself and the fake news would disingenuously report as the truth) and begin to honestly and accurately report the news or they can double-down on their usual tactics and hope to defeat Trump with twice their usual hysteria and demagoguery. The problem for CNN (et al.) with the former is that, if they were to start honestly reporting the news, that would be the end of the Democratic Party they serve.

It is nothing but the incessant use of fake news (read: propaganda) that keeps the Left alive. Imagine, for example, if CNN had honestly and accurately reported then-candidate Barack Obama’s close ties to foreign terrorists (Rashid Khalidi), domestic terrorists (William Ayers & Bernardine Dohrn), the mafia (Tony Rezko) or the true evils of his spiritual mentor, Jeremiah Wright’s church. Imagine if they had honestly and accurately conveyed the evils of the Obama administration’s weaponizing of the IRS to be used against their political opponents or his running of guns to the Mexican cartels or the truth about the murder of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and the Obama administration’s cover-up.

So, to my friends on the Left — and the #NeverTrumpers as well — do I wish we lived in a time when our president could be “collegial” and “dignified” and “proper”? Of course I do. These aren’t those times. This is war. And it’s a war that the Left has been fighting without opposition for the past 50 years. So, say anything you want about this president - I get it - he can be vulgar, he can be crude, he can be undignified at times. I don’t care. I can’t spare this man. He fights for America!

How Civil Wars Are Effected

HOW DO CIVIL WARS HAPPEN?
Two or more sides disagree on who runs the country. And they can’t settle the question through elections because they don’t even agree that elections are how you decide who’s in charge.
That’s the basic issue here. Who decides who runs the country? When you hate each other but accept the election results, you have a country. When you stop accepting election results, you have a countdown to a Civil War.
The Mueller investigation is about removing President Trump from office and overturning the results of an election. We all know that. But it’s not the first time they’ve done this. The first time a Conservative president was elected this century, they said he didn’t really win. The Supreme Court gave him the election. There’s a pattern here.
What do sure odds of the Leftists rejecting the next Conservative president really mean? It means they don’t accept the results of any election that they don’t win. It means they don’t believe that transfers of power in this country are determined by elections.
That’s a Civil War.
There’s no shooting. At least not unless you count the attempt to kill a bunch of Republicans at a charity baseball game practice. But the Leftists have rejected our system of government.
This isn’t dissent. It’s not disagreement. You can hate the other party. You can think they’re the worst thing that ever happened to the country. But then you work harder to win the next election. When you consistently reject the results of elections that you don’t win, what you want is a dictatorship. Your very own dictatorship.
The only legitimate exercise of power in this country, according to Leftists, is their own. Whenever Conservatives exercise power, it’s inherently illegitimate. The Leftists lost Congress. They lost the White House. So what did they do? They began trying to run the country through Federal judges and bureaucrats. Every time that a Federal judge issues an order saying that the President of the United States can’t scratch his own back without his say so, that’s the Civil War.
Our system of government is based on the constitution, but that’s not the system that runs this country. The Leftists' system is that any part of government that it runs gets total and unlimited power over the country.
If the Leftists are in the White House, then the president can do anything. And I mean anything. He can have his own amnesty for illegal aliens. He can fine you for not having health insurance. He can gentrify the nation. His power is unlimited. He’s a dictator.
But when Conservatives get into the White House, suddenly the President can’t do anything. He isn’t even allowed to undo the illegal alien amnesty that his predecessor illegally invented. A Leftist in the White House has “discretion” to completely decide every aspect of immigration policy. A Conservative doesn’t even have the “discretion” to reverse him. That’s how the game is played. That’s how our country is run. Sad but true, although the left hasn’t yet won that particular fight, they are 100% dedicated to do so.
When a Leftists is in the White House, states aren’t even allowed to enforce immigration law. But when a Conservative is in the White House, states can create their own immigration laws. Under Obama, with the Media always having his back, a state wasn’t allowed to go to the bathroom without asking permission. But under Trump, Jerry Brown can go around saying that California is an independent republic and sign treaties with other countries.
The Constitution has something to say about that.
Whether it’s Federal or State, Executive, Legislative or Judiciary, the left moves power around to run the country. If it controls an institution, then that institution, Universities for example, is suddenly the supreme power in the land. This is what I call a moving dictatorship.
Donald Trump has caused the Shadow Government to come out of hiding: Leftists Professional government is a guild. Like medieval guilds. You can’t serve in if you’re not a member. If you haven’t been indoctrinated into its arcane rituals. If you aren’t in the club. And Trump isn’t in the club. He brought in a bunch of Americans who aren’t in the club with him.
Now we’re seeing what the pros do when amateurs try to walk in on them. They spy on them, they investigate them and they send them to jail. They use the tools honed by Stalin, Hitler and other Dictators of power to bring them down.
That’s not a free country.
It’s not a free country when FBI agents who support Hillary take out an “insurance policy” against Trump winning the election. It’s not a free country when Obama officials engage in massive unmasking of the opposition. It’s not a free country when the Leftist Media, another guild, responds to the other guy winning by trying to ban the conservative media that supported him from social media. It’s not a free country when all of the above collude together to overturn an election because the guy who wasn’t supposed to win, wins.
Have no doubt, we’re in a Civil War between conservative volunteer government and a leftist professional government guild

A take on Donald Trump

                                       A TAKE ON DONALD TRUMP

A different take on Donald Trump:  (a non-political agenda)

Trump Is Not A Liberal or Conservative, He's a "Pragmatist."

(Definition: A pragmatist is someone who is practical and focused on reaching a goal. A pragmatist usually has a straightforward, matter-of-fact approach and doesn't let emotion distract him or her.)

"We recently enjoyed a belated holiday dinner with friends at the home of other friends. The dinner conversation varied from discussions about antique glass and china to theology and politics.

At one point, reference was made to Donald Trump being a conservative, to which I responded that Trump is not a conservative.

I said that I neither view nor do I believe Trump views himself as a conservative. I stated it was my opinion that Trump is a pragmatist. He sees a problem and  understands it must be fixed. He doesn't see the problem as liberal or conservative, he sees it only as a problem. That is a quality that should be admired and applauded, not condemned. But I get ahead of myself.

Viewing problems from a Liberal perspective has resulted in the creation of more problems, more entitlement programs, more victims, more government, more political correctness, and more attacks on the working class in all economic strata.

Viewing things according to the so-called Republican conservative perspective has brought continued spending and globalism to the detriment of American interests and well being, denial of what the real problems are, weak, ineffective, milquetoast, leadership that amounts to Barney Fife Deputy Sheriff, appeasement oriented and afraid of its own shadow. In brief, it has brought liberal ideology with a pachyderm as a mascot juxtaposed to the ass of the Democrat Party.

Immigration isn't a Republican problem, it isn't a Liberal problem, it is a problem that threatens the very fabric and infrastructure of America. It demands a pragmatic approach not an approach that is intended to appease one group or another.

The impending collapse of the economy wasn't a Liberal or Conservative problem, it is an American problem. That said, until it is viewed as a problem that demands a common sense approach to resolution, it will never be fixed because the Democrats and Republicans know only one way to fix things and the longevity of  their impracticality has proven to have no lasting effect.

Successful businessmen like Donald Trump find ways to make things work, they do not promise to accommodate.

Trump uniquely understands that China's manipulation of currency is not a Republican problem or a Democrat problem. It is a problem that threatens our financial stability and he understands the proper balance needed to fix it.

Here again, successful businessmen like Trump who have weathered the changing tides of economic reality understand what is necessary to make business work, and they, unlike both sides of the political aisle, know that if something doesn't work, you don't continue trying to make it work hoping that at some point it will.

As a pragmatist, Donald Trump hasn't made wild pie-in-the-sky promises of a cell phone in every pocket, free college tuition, and a $15 hour minimum wage for working the drive-through at Carl's Hamburgers.

I argue that America needs pragmatists because pragmatists see a problem and find ways to fix them. They do not see a problem and compound it by creating more problems.

You may not like Donald Trump, but I suspect that the reason some people do not like him is because:

     (1) he is antithetical to the "good old boy" method of brokering backroom deals that fatten the coffers of politicians;

     (2) they are unaccustomed to hearing a president speak who is unencumbered by the financial shackles of those who he owes vis-a-vis donations;

     (3) he is someone who is free of idiomatic political ideology;

     (4) he says what he is thinking, is unapologetic for his outspoken thoughts, speaks very straightforward using everyday language that can be understood by all (and is offensive to some who dislike him anyway) making him a great communicator, for the most part, does what he says he will do and;

   

(5) he is someone who understands that it takes more than hollow promises and political correctness to make America great again.

Listening to Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders talk about fixing America is like listening to two lunatics trying to "out crazy" one another. Jeb Bush, John Kasich and Marco Rubio are owned lock, stock, and barrel by the bankers, corporations, and big dollar donors funding their campaigns. Bush can deny it, but common sense tells anyone willing to face facts is that people don't give tens of millions without expecting something in return.

We have had Democrats and Republican ideologues and what has it brought us? Are we better off today or worse off? Has it happened overnight or has it been a steady decline brought on by both parties?

I submit that a pragmatist is just what America needs right now. People are quick to confuse and despise confidence as arrogance, but that is common among those who have never accomplished anything in their lives (or politicians who never really solved a problem, because it's better to still have an "issue(s) to be solved," so re-elect me to solve it, (which never happens) and those who have always played it safe (again, all politicians) not willing to risk failure, to try and achieve success).

Donald Trump put his total financial empire at risk in running for president and certainly did not need or possibly even want the job; that says it all. He wants success for the U.S. and her citizens because he loves his country!

Are We Ready

Interesting read and a little scary!


Predictions:
1. Auto repair shops go away. A gasoline engine has 20,000 individual parts. An electrical engine has 20. Electric cars are sold with lifetime guarantees and are only repaired by dealers. It takes only 10  minutes to remove and replace an electric engine. Faulty electric engines are not repaired in the dealership but are sent to a regional repair shop that repairs them with robots Essentially, if your electric "Check Motor" light comes on, you simply drive up to what looks like a car wash. Your car is towed through while you have a cup of coffee and out comes your car with a new engine.

2. Gas stations go away. Parking meters are replaced by meters that dispense electricity. All companies install electrical recharging stations.

3. All major auto manufacturers have already designated 5-6 billion dollars each to start building new plants that only build electric cars.

4. Coal industries go away. Oil companies go away.
Drilling for oil stops.

5. Homes produce and store more electrical energy during the day and then they use and will sell it back to the grid. The grid stores it and dispenses it to industries that are high electricity users.
 
A baby of today will only see personal cars in museums.
                   

   
Yet digital cameras were invented in 1975 The first ones only had 10,000 pixels, but followed Moore's law So as with all exponential technologies, it was a disappointment for a time, before it became way superior and became mainstream in only a few short years.  It will now happen again (but much faster) with Artificial Intelligence, health,
autonomous and electric cars, education, 3D printing, agriculture and jobs. 
   
Welcome to the 4th Industrial Revolution.
 

6. In the U.S., young lawyers already don't get jobs. Because of IBM's Watson, you can get legal advice (so far for more or less basic stuff) within seconds, with 90% accuracy compared with 70% accuracy when done by humans. So, if you study law, stop immediately. There will be 90% fewer lawyers in the future, only omniscient specialists will remain.
 
6A. Watson already helps nurses diagnosing cancer, its 4 times more accurate than human nurses.
     
7. Facebook now has a pattern recognition software that can recognize faces better than humans. In 2030, computers will become more intelligent than humans. 
 
8. Autonomous cars: In 2018 the  first self-driving cars will appear for the public Around 2020, the complete industry will start to be disrupted. You don't want to own a car anymore. You will call a car with your phone, it will show up at your location and drive you to your destination. You will not need to park it you only pay for the driven distance and can be productive while driving. The very young children of today will never get a driver's license and will never own a car.
 
8A. It will change the cities, because we will need 90-95% fewer cars for that we can transform former parking spaces into parks.
   
1.2 million people die each year in car accidents worldwide. We now have one accident every 60,000 mi (100,000 km), with autonomous driving that will drop to 1 accident in 6 million miles (10 million km). That will save a million lives worldwide each year.
   
8B. Most car companies will doubtless become bankrupt. Traditional car companies try the evolutionary approach and just build a better car, while tech companies (Tesla, Apple, Google) will do the revolutionary approach and build a computer on wheels.
 
8C. Many engineers from Volkswagen and Audi are completely terrified of Tesla
 
9. Insurance companies will have massive trouble because, without accidents, the insurance will become 100x cheaper. Their car insurance business model will disappear.
 
10. Real estate will change. Because if you can work while you commute, people will move further away to live in a more beautiful neighborhood.
   
11. Electric cars will become mainstream about 2020.  Cities will be less noisy because all new cars will run on electricity.
   
12. Electricity will become incredibly cheap and clean: Solar production has been on an exponential curve for 30 years, but you can now see the burgeoning impact.
   
13. Last year, more solar energy was installed worldwide than fossil. Energy companies are desperately trying to limit access to the grid to prevent competition from home solar installations, but that simply cannot continue.. technology will take care of that strategy.
   
14. With cheap electricity comes cheap and abundant water. Desalination of salt water now only needs 2kWh per cubic meter (@ 0.25 cents). We don't have scarce water in most places, we only have scarce drinking water. Imagine what will be possible if anyone can have as much clean water as he  wants, for nearly no cost.
   
15. Health: The Tricorder X price will be announced this year. There are companies who will build a medical device (called the "Tricorder" from  Star Trek) that works with your phone, which takes your retina scan, your blood sample and you breath into it. It then analyses 54 bio-markers that will identify nearly any disease. It will be cheap, so in a few years everyone on this planet will have access to world class medical analysis, nearly for free. 
 
16. 3D printing: The price of the cheapest 3D printer came down from $18,000 to $400 within 10 years. In the same time, it became 100 times faster. All major shoe companies have already started 3D printing shoes.
   
17. Some spare airplane parts are already 3D printed in remote airports. The space station now has a printer that eliminates the need for the large amount of spare parts they used to have in the past.
 
18. At the end of this year, new smart phones will have 3D scanning possibilities. You can then 3D scan your feet and print your perfect shoe at home.
 
19. In China, they already 3D printed and built a complete 6-story office building. By 2027, 10% of everything that's being produced will be 3D printed.
   
20. Business opportunities: If you think of a niche you want to go in, first ask yourself: "In the future, do I think we will have that?" And, if the answer is yes, how can you make that happen sooner?
 
20A. If it doesn't work with your phone, forget the idea. Any idea designed for success in the 20th century is doomed to failure in the 21st century.
 
20B. Work: 70-80% of jobs will disappear in the next 20 years. There will be a lot of new jobs, but it is not clear if there will be enough new jobs in such a short time. 
 
21. Agriculture: There will be a $100 agricultural robot in the future. Farmers in 3rd world countries can then become managers of their field instead of working all day on their fields. 
   
22. Aeroponics will need much less water. The first Petri dish produced veal is now available and will be cheaper than cow produced veal in 2018. Right now, 30% of all agricultural surfaces is used for cows. Imagine if we don't need that space anymore.
 
23. There are several startups who will bring insect protein to the market shortly. It contains more protein than meat. It will be labeled as "alternative protein source".

Are we ready for all this?

Worlds Largest Duuuhhh State In The World

> CALIFORNIA -  LARGEST INSANE ASYLUM IN THE WORLD.
> Interesting that the LA Times did this.  Lou Dobbs reported this on CNN and it cost him his job. The only network we would see this on would be FOX.
>
> All the others are staying away from it.  Whether you are a Democrat or Republican, this should be of great interest to you!
> Just One State - be sure and read the last part... try for 3 times.  This is only one State... If this doesn't open your eyes, nothing will!
> From the L.A. Times:
>
> 1.  40% of all workers in LA County (10.2 million people) are working for cash; and not paying taxes.  This is because they are predominantly
>      illegal immigrants, working without a green card.  (Donald Trump was right.)
>
> 2.  95% of warrants for murder in Los Angeles are for illegal aliens.
>
> 3.  75% of people on the most wanted list in Los Angeles are illegal aliens.
>
> 4.  Over 2/3 of all births in Los Angeles County are to illegal alien Mexicans on Medi-Cal, whose births were paid for by taxpayers.
>
> 5.  Nearly 35% of all inmates in California detention centers are Mexican nationals; they are here illegally.
>
> 6.  Over 300,000 illegal aliens in Los Angeles County are living in garages.
>
> 7.  The FBI reports half of all gang members in Los Angeles are most likely illegal aliens from south of the border.
>
> 8.  Nearly 60% of all occupants of HUD properties are illegal.
>
> 9.  21 radio stations in LA are Spanish- speaking.
>
> 10.  In LA County, 5.1 million people speak English; 3.9 million speak Spanish.  (There are 10.2 million people, in LA County.)
>
> All 10 of the above facts were published in the Los Angeles Times.  Less than 2% of illegal aliens are picking our crops, but 29% are
> on welfare. Over 70% of the United States' annual population growth (and over 90% in California , Florida and New York), results
> from immigration.  Also, 29% of inmates in federal prisons are illegal aliens.  We are fools for letting this continue.
>
> HOW CAN YOU HELP?  Send copies of this letter, to at least two other people.  100 people would be even better.  This is only one State...If this
> doesn't open your eyes nothing will, and you wonder why Nancy Pelosi wants them to become voters!
>
> And then there's NANCY PELOSI:
> Nancy Pelosi (who was just re-elected and part of this problem) wants a Windfall Tax on Retirement Income.  In other words, tax what you have
> made by investing toward your retirement.  This woman is a nut case!  You aren't going to believe this…; Windfall Tax on Retirement Income... Adding a
> tax to your retirement is simply another way of saying to the American people "you're so dammed stupid that we're going to keep doing this until we
> drain every cent from you".  Nancy Pelosi wants to put a Windfall Tax on all stock market profits (including Retirement fund, 401K and Mutual
> Funds).  Alas, it is true- all to help the 12 Million Illegal Immigrants and other unemployed Minorities!  This woman is frightening. She quotes...
> 'We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income, (didn't Marx say something like this?) in our country; and at the same time limiting the
> amount the rich can invest. (I'm not rich, are you?)
>
> When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied:  "We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed and minorities.
> For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities.
> Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long way to guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as Americans."
> (Read that quote again and again and let it sink in.) 'Lower your retirement; give it to others who have not worked, as you have, for your money.
>

Barack Obama, The Mystery of Who?

Subject: OBAMA THE MYSTERY
THE UNANSWERED MYSTERY OF THE CENTURY !!!



His 8 years of living in the White House is over.

This came from a union guy in Chicago who didn't vote for Obama.
Very interesting perspective !!!

It will be interesting to see what they put in his "Library" about his
early years now that he is out of office.

In a country where we take notice of many, many facets of our public
figures' lives, doesn't it seem odd that there's so little we know
about Barack Obama?

For example, we know that Andrew Jackson's wife smoked a corn cob pipe
and was accused of adultery; Abe Lincoln never went to school; Jack
Kennedy wore a back brace; Harry Truman played the piano.

As Americans, we enjoy knowing details about our news makers, but none
of us know one single humanizing fact about the history of our own
ex-president.

We are all aware of the lack of incontestable birth records for Obama;
that document managing has been spectacularly successful.

There are however, several additional oddities in Obama's history that
appear to be as well managed as the birthing issue.

One other interesting thing...   There are no birth certificates of
his daughters that can be found?

It's interesting that no one who ever dated him has shown up. The
charisma that caused women to be drawn to him so strongly during his
campaign, certainly would in the normal course of events, lead some
lady to come forward, if only to garner some attention for herself. We
all know about JFK's magnetism, that McCain was no monk and quite a
few details about Palin's courtship and even her athletic prowess, Joe
Biden's aneurysms are no secret; look at Cheney and Clinton, we all
know about their heart  problems. Certainly Wild Bill Clinton's
exploits before and during his White House years, were well known.
That's why it's so odd that not one lady has stepped up and said, "He
was soooo shy..." or "What a great dancer..."

It's virtually impossible to know anything about this fellow. Who was
best man at his wedding? Start there. Then check groomsmen.

Then get the footage of the graduation ceremony. Has anyone talked to
the professors?  It is odd that no one is bragging that they knew him
or taught him or lived with him.

When did he meet Michele, and how? Are there photos there? Every
president gives to the public all their photos, etc. for their
library, etc.  What has he released? And who voted for him to be the
most popular man in 2010?  Doesn't this make you wonder?

Ever wonder why no one ever came forward from Obama's past saying they
knew him, attended school with him, was his friend, etc??  Not one
person has ever come forward from his past.

It certainly is very, very strange...

This should be a cause for great concern. To those who voted for him,
you may have elected an unqualified, inexperienced shadow man. Have
you seen a movie named "The Manchurian Candidate”?

As insignificant as each of us might be, someone with whom we went to
school will remember our name or face; someone will remember we were
the clown or the dork or the brain or the quiet one or the bully or
something about  us.

George Stephanopoulos of ABC News said the same thing during the 2008
campaign.

He questions why no one has acknowledged he was in their classroom or
ate in the same cafeteria or made impromptu speeches on campus.
Stephanopoulos also was a classmate of Obama at Columbia -- the class
of 1984.  He says he never had a single class with him.

He is such a great orator; why doesn't anyone in Obama's college class
remember him? Why won't he allow Columbia to release his records?
Nobody remembers Obama at Columbia University.

Looking for evidence of Obama's past, Fox News contacted 400 Columbia
University students from the period when Obama claims to have been
there... but none remembered him.

Wayne Allyn Root was, like Obama, a political science major at
Columbia who also graduated in 1983. In 2008, Root says of Obama, "I
don't know a single person at Columbia that knew him, and they all
know me. I don't have a classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at
Columbia, ever."

Nobody recalls him. Root adds that he was also, like Obama, Class of
'83 Political Science, and says, "You don't get more exact or closer
than that. Never met him in my life, don't know anyone who ever met
him. At class reunion, our 20th reunion five years ago, who was asked
to be the speaker of the class?  Me.  No one ever heard of Barack!

And five years ago, nobody even knew who he was. The guy who writes
the class notes, who's kind of the, as we say in New York, 'the macha'
who knows everybody, has yet to find a person, a human who ever met
him."

Obama's photograph does not appear in the school's yearbooks and Obama
consistently declines requests to talk about his years at Columbia,
provide school records, or provide the name of any former classmates
or friends while at Columbia.

Some other interesting questions:

1.Why was Obama's law license inactivated in 2002?   It is said there
is no record of him ever taking the Bar exam.



2...Why was Michelle's law license inactivated by court order? We
understand that it was forced to avoid fraud charges.

It is circulating that according to the U.S. Census, there is only one
Barack Obama but 27 Social Security numbers and over 80 alias' are
connected to him.

The Social Security number he uses now originated in Connecticut where
he is reported to have never lived. And was originally registered to
another man (Thomas Louis Wood) from Connecticut, who died in Hawaii
while on vacation there.



As we all know Social Security Numbers are only issued 'once, they are
not reused.  No wonder all his records are sealed...

Please continue sending this out.  Somewhere, someone has to know
SOMETHING, before he reorganized Chicago?... SOMETHING!!!   He just
seemed to burst upon the scene at the 2004 Democratic Convention.
ANYONE???    ANYWHERE???    ANYTHING???

I think soon much is going to come to light about this highly
unqualified person who was President of the United States for 8 years.
Soon, we will know how badly we were all doped and duped by this
impostor who has basically, with much help from his minions, brought
the greatest nation in history to its knees in ruins.

That will be his legacy.

He totally destroyed the Integrity, morals and Christian heritage of
our once great country.